
While State of Play is an enjoyable, well-made film with good performances from a strong cast, it ultimately suffers in comparison to the far superior television series. This is to be expected considering that the series managed to fill 6 hours with a dense, multi-layered story, whereas the film only lasts a third of that time. It actually turned out to be a much more faithful adaptation than I would have expected (almost every scene of the movie was derived in some way from the original series), but the fact is that it all felt a bit rushed, and generally lacking in subtlety. What suffers most are the relationships between the characters - in particular I never got any sense that Affleck's and Crowe's characters could ever have been long-term friends, unlike John Simm and David Morrissey in the TV show. I did think that the (non-sexual) chemistry between Crowe and Rachel McAdams as a young reporter was quite successful though.
Overall I did enjoy the film, but there was never anything particularly remarkable about it. Had I not seen the BBC series I may have had a better opinion of it, but even then I suspect that it's not a film I'd go out of my way to see again anytime soon.
VERDICT: It holds your interest but doesn't do much more than that. Watch the TV series.
EDIT: Something that I just remembered that's worth mentioning - the presence of Brennan Brown, AKA "the guy from the Orange mobile cinema ads", rendered all of his scenes unintentionally hilarious. I doubt there's a single UK cinema audience in the UK that won't start laughing when he turns up...
No comments:
Post a Comment